While executive orders can provide quick solutions, they are inherently fragile. They only last as long as the president who signed them remains in office—or until a new president decides to reverse them. This temporary nature highlights the urgent need for Congress to pass legislation that turns these policies into durable laws.

For too long, traditional civil rights organizations such as the NAACP and Urban League have monopolized advocacy for Black communities. While their historic contributions are undeniable, their modern priorities have largely aligned with political agendas that often overlook core issues plaguing our families and communities. The Institute for Family and Community Advancement rises as a bold, values-driven alternative—one rooted in family resilience, educational freedom, economic self-reliance, and justice reform.

Most of all we must reject the dystopian future this prosecution threatens to create. Courage should never be a crime. Protecting others should never be punished. If we lose that, we lose something far greater than this case—we lose the very foundation of what makes us a community.

This policy represents a bold step toward rebuilding Black families, reducing government dependency, and fostering stability for future generations. By incentivizing marriage and cohabitation, it aligns financial rewards with behaviors that have proven benefits for children and society.

Reforming the presidency and government isn’t about undermining the office but ensuring it remains accountable to the people. By enacting these reforms, the United States can safeguard itself against the whims of any future leader and create a foundation for lasting stability and prosperity.

The global surge of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), now a social component woven into the fabric of ESG standards (Environmental, Social, Governance), marks a potent force on the global stage. Yet we still struggle to learn whether it is a force for good or a potentially diabolical one.

TST’s website states that TST is a religious organization that provides abortion health care. Mr. Mammen said that providing a service to abort babies has nothing to do with religion or health care.

Mr. Mammen said that since the beginning of time, medical care has never been about killing anything. The Hippocratic Oath for doctors includes doing no harm. This is not only an issue about the fetus but also an issue about women.

He said that most women who’ve gone through abortions have experienced trauma years later, and it’s not short-term trauma; it’s long-term trauma. In fact, there are entire counseling organizations dedicated to counseling women who are suffering post-traumatic stress from an abortion way back in their youth.

DEI-driven activists are reimagining medical practice to deliver healthcare depending upon a patient’s race, sex, gender, and rank on the “oppressor” scale. Patients are treated or not treated based upon their race, ethnicity, religion, sex, gender identity, social class, ability, immigration status, and more. How does that make sense? Measuring a patient’s political-social worthiness cannot be the doctors’ job when healthcare is needed.

The dilemma this creates, however, is that people who are placed in positions for which they would not otherwise qualify, are viewed and callously dismissed as “diversity hires.” Being so labeled bestows no dignity, but instead undermines personal integrity and the commitment to excellence and competency.

To this day, Marx’s philosophy encourages the “exploited” proletariat class to rise up and control or eliminate the bourgeoisie “ruling class.” Vladimir Lenin, the Bolshevik who launched the late Soviet Union, upshifted Marxism to achieve utopia by mobilizing the “masses” to undermine capitalism and meritocracy